Documentary photograph illustrating setting a Baseline Scenario
← Back to blog

Setting a Baseline Scenario: Four Approaches and Their Trade-offs

Sustainability•22 September 2026•TREEO Indonesia•1 min read

The baseline is the carbon trajectory that would have occurred without the project. It cannot be measured, but only argued, and because credits are the difference between baseline and measured project carbon, the baseline determines revenue as directly as the measurement does.

Four Ways to Construct One

ApproachBasisStrengthWeakness
Historical extrapolationPast loss rates in a reference regionSimple, data-availableReference region choice drives the answer
Modelled projectionDrivers of change projected forwardHandles changing conditionsModel assumptions carry the argument
Jurisdictional allocationLandscape risk allocated centrallyConsistent, hard to gameLittle project discretion
Matched control areasComparable unprotected areas tracked liveEmpirically groundedFinding true matches is difficult

The direction of travel across standards is from the first toward the third. The reason is straightforward: project-selected reference regions produced defensible-but-divergent baselines for neighbouring projects, which is indefensible when viewed from outside.

The Conservativeness Requirement

Standards require baselines to be conservative, meaning where uncertainty exists, the assumption should understate rather than overstate the project's benefit.

This is not merely ethical framing. A baseline that an assessor finds optimistic attracts discounting, and the discount is applied to the whole crediting stream rather than to the disputed portion. Conservative baselines cost credits upfront; optimistic ones cost more later.

Why Baseline Choice Interacts With Sampling

Credits are a subtraction, so uncertainty compounds across both terms.

If the baseline is externally set and the project's own estimate is imprecise, the entire uncertainty burden sits on the project side, and the conservative deduction takes its share from the only number the project controls.

That is the practical reason methodological rigour on the project side has become more valuable as baselines have moved outside project control, not less.

Let's build your verified carbon portfolio

A carbon project demands rigorous science, strict compliance, and flawless data. TREEO guides projects from feasibility through validation and verification, while building the evidence that survives each audit.

Related Articles